Multi-accounts in online casinos: what are they and why are they prohibited

The online gaming platform has long ceased to be just a place for bets and spinning reels. It operates as a high-load ecosystem with internal economy, intelligent balance systems, behavioral triggers, and real-time analytics. At this level, even the slightest intervention changes everything. And multi-accounts in online casinos turn not into a violation, but into a fundamental failure.

The digital double of a player creates not just the illusion of massiveness — it disrupts the balance: distorts statistics, hacks bonus mechanics, withdraws real money without the intention to play. As a result, the platform loses not only resources but also the trust of those who came for fair play. The rhythm is disrupted, the logic of the economy is broken, algorithms are thrown off. Fighting multi-accounting becomes a central element of the internal policy of most licensed operators.

The Nature and Evolution of Multi-Accounts in Online Casinos

The mechanics of multi-accounts in online casinos started simply: one user — two accounts created from different email addresses. Today, everything works at the level of digital masks, anti-detection browsers, and schemes closer to financial espionage than simple manipulation.

Formally, a multi-account is any case where one person registers multiple accounts on the same platform. The goal is to deceive bonus mechanisms, outsmart rakeback algorithms, influence tournaments, or create a network of accounts to coordinate gameplay with an advantage. In practice, it is a full-fledged system that includes:

• virtualized profiles with unique fingerprints;
• sim cards registered with fake data;
• dynamic proxies with IP rotation;
• device interceptors to emulate real behavior;
• API automation for instant response in the game.

Why Multi-Accounts Disrupt the Internal Economy of Online Casinos

Multi-accounts in online casinos not only “violate the rules” — they interfere with the mathematical architecture of the platform. Any gaming system is built on probabilities, RTP models, bonus limitations, and withdrawal restrictions. When one person receives 5–10 starter packages, the system falls apart.

There is a concept of GGR (Gross Gaming Revenue) — the difference between players’ bets and their winnings. With normal user behavior, GGR is stable. But multi-accounting creates a distorted picture: the platform credits 100 bonuses instead of one, considers activity real, and ultimately loses money on empty traffic.

Real cases:

• on a platform with daily registration of 1,000 users, up to 10% may be multi-accounts;
• average registration bonus — $25;
• leakage — $2,500 daily, just from one abuse line;
• monthly — $75,000 in direct losses.

Plus — indirect losses: decrease in trust level, outflow of honest players, overload of support services, analytics failure, and the need for additional verification for all new users.

Operational Schemes of Multi-Accounts in Online Casinos: Examples and Strategies

Fraudsters adapt schemes to the architecture of a specific platform. The main vectors are bonus hunting, risk splitting, manipulation in tournaments, and collusion in games with live dealers. One of the most common strategies is the bonus fan scheme:

1. Registration with 5–10 accounts for one bonus package (e.g., free spins or $100 for a deposit).
2. Instant execution with minimal risk (low volatility games).
3. Transfer of winnings through P2P cards or crypto wallets.
4. Erasing traces: deleting cookies, changing IP, resetting fingerprints.
5. Repeat on a new pool of devices.

More advanced schemes are also used:

• tournament scrolling: a series of accounts participating in a tournament are launched from one IP. One sacrifices points, the other gains.
• bet splitting: in live roulette, accounts place opposite bets, covering the field. One wins, losses are distributed among the rest.
• smart bots: automation of bets considering win frequency, analysis of RNG responses, and trends in slots.

Each scheme requires not only technical preparation but also an understanding of platform logic. Creating multi-accounts in online casinos is not a mass chaotic attack but a pinpoint strategy, often coordinated at the level of Telegram channels or forums.

Legal and Licensing Perspective: How Multi-Accounts Violate Legislative Norms

At first glance, multi-accounts in online casinos may seem like internal non-compliance with the user agreement. But in reality, they penetrate the sphere of legal responsibility and violate licensing obligations to regulatory bodies.

Most licenses — from Malta Gaming Authority, Curaçao eGaming, UK Gambling Commission, and other regulators — strictly prescribe requirements for transaction transparency, fairness control, and prevention of money laundering. Each case of multi-accounting:

• violates the principle of user uniqueness;
• distorts data in reporting;
• may be considered money laundering in the presence of anonymous payment operations;
• jeopardizes compliance with AML/KYC requirements.

The presence of a large number of multi-accounts lowers the reliability rating of the online casino and potentially blocks access to licenses from other countries. In cases where a user uses a scheme in combination with cryptocurrency transactions, suspicion of financing illegal activities may arise. This leads to:

• an audit of the entire platform;
• checks from tax and law enforcement agencies;
• freezing of internal and external accounts.

Ignoring the problem poses an existential risk to the platform.

Real Consequences: Figures, Blocks, Losses

Statistics from leading platforms confirm that multi-accounts in online casinos have become one of the main reasons for mass blocks in 2024. Average industry indicators include:

• 3–8% of accounts are blocked monthly due to multi-account signals;
• up to 30% of the bonus fund “burns” on multi-chains;
• one platform lost $270,000 in a quarter due to schemes with tenfold accounts;
• on average, 1 multi-account creates 3 to 10 digital copies.

Platforms are strengthening moderation. Some services have implemented video identification upon the first withdrawal request, require a bank card linked to the account name, and analyze click speed when confirming transactions.

How Operators Block and Prevent Multi-Accounting in Online Casinos: Overview of Strategies

Multi-accounts in online casinos require not only detection but also systematic prevention. The best defense is not in the bath after the violation but in creating conditions where deception becomes unprofitable.

Effective measures:

1. Unique bonus for a verified phone. Blocks mass registrations.
2. Mandatory document verification before the first withdrawal. Eliminates anonymous accounts.
3. Fingerprinting considering hardware parameters. Helps identify duplicates at the “hardware” level.
4. Exclusion of mass registrations from one IP segment.
5. Restrictions on using one payment method in more than one account.
6. Analysis of login frequency and behavior in the first 10 minutes after registration.
7. Integration with third-level anti-fraud services: SEON, Iovation, Sumsub.
8. System of dynamic captchas and temporary isolation of repeat attempts.

These steps form an intelligent perimeter — digital protection that reacts not to the fact but to probability. Such behavior is necessary in an era where creating multi-accounts in online casinos has become an organized scheme.

Conclusion

Creating multi-accounts in online casinos has ceased to be just a rule violation. It has turned into an algorithmically built model for undermining the platform — with deliberate steps, resources, and even shadow groups coordinating actions. Each multi-account is not just an extra profile but a digital anomaly disrupting the economy, throwing off analytics, and destroying the value of the gaming experience for honest users. Operators who leave this unchecked risk not only loss of profit but also brand destruction at the trust level.

Therefore, platforms are actively restructuring internal algorithms, strengthening KYC policies, introducing behavioral detectors, and investing in digital identification. In the future, the fight against multi-accounts in online casinos will become a de facto standard in licensing and operational design.